Hele "eskalerings" - debatten er vendt på hovedet.

The problem with that escalation: The policy of "no poking the Russian bear" is not valid - simple as that. In fact that deterrence concept has it all wrong. To put it simply: It is the other way round!
In other words, whenever Russia escalates: Such as bombing a childrens hospital, then a new range of sanctions are slammed onto the russians and new supplies are flown in - such as another 300.000 artillery shells found in obscure corners of the world.
The most recent russian provocation with a "shadow-fleet" plimsoller with 20.000 tons of ammonium nitrate splashing around the Norwegean coast, refused passage through the danish straits and now floundering around Kent. Lets see how that provocation is topped? One suggestion is complete closure to ships either to or from russia through the danish straits, as f.l. chinese achor dragging over communication cabels. That provocation resultet in a few billion USD aid to Ukraine.

The danish/swedish investment in ukrainian arms industry is more a hint to arms producers that: If they want to get the production volume nescessary for cost (hence price) reduction, they better come up with something battle proven by competent operators at a price worth considering. Financing the investment is not a problem, there are tons of seized russian looted money just waiting for a safe investment paper (such as sovereign danish bonds, they will be expensive, but there is no inflation so they are safe from russian mice gnawking on the principal). That leaves a lot of cash in the danish central bank - for the use in investments.