Økonomidebatten.dk
Vil du reagere på denne meddelelse? Tilmeld dig forummet med et par klik eller log ind for at fortsætte.

Lyder dette bekendt?

Go down

Lyder dette bekendt? Empty Lyder dette bekendt?

Indlæg af Thomas Lør Jan 28, 2012 9:34 am

Kina syndromet!

As in the U.S. and European real estate busts, Chanos says that China’s property bubble is infecting its banking system. The country has already had to cleanse and recapitalize its banks twice—in 1999 and 2003. Basically, it took non-performing loans off the banks’ books and put them into specially created asset management companies, which then issued long-term bonds for them. “And guess who bought the bonds?” says Chanos. “The banks.”

Hvem er det lige, der køber flexobligationerne?

But there are several fundamental differences between China’s real estate boom and the property debacles in the United States and Europe, Mobius argues. First, the surge in commercial and residential demand in China is mostly real, not just a bidding-up of asset prices. “If it’s a bubble, why are so many people still living in substandard housing in China?” he asks. And he doesn’t buy that there’s the same toxic spillover to the financial system, either—China doesn’t have the credit default swaps and other ersatz real estate-linked securities that triggered the market collapses in the West in 2008. “The subprime crisis was a derivatives crisis,” Mobius says.

Det skal jeg såmænd sige dig: Fordi folk ikke har råd til et bedre hus: Ren Ødestad. Det kan man da kalde at skyde sig selv i foden.
Thomas
Thomas

Antal indlæg : 34107
Join date : 27/10/08

Tilbage til toppen Go down

Tilbage til toppen

- Lignende emner

 
Forumtilladelser:
Du kan ikke besvare indlæg i dette forum